The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of temperature and sand substrate in tanks on the growth and survival of the warty sea cucumber Neostichopus grammatus
|
---|---|
Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/00288330.2024.2351024 |
Authors |
Abigail John Onomu, Heleen Senekal, Matthew James Slater, Niall Gordon Vine |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,994,188
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
#154
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,152
of 237,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them