The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
S-Nitrosothiol Signals in the Enteric Nervous System: Lessons Learnt from Big Brother
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2011.00031 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tor C. Savidge |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 8 | 44% |
Researcher | 5 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 28% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 61% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,830,413
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,473
of 11,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,317
of 121,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them