↓ Skip to main content

DCRM 2.0: Multispecialty practice recommendations for the management of diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 3,583)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
282 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DCRM 2.0: Multispecialty practice recommendations for the management of diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases
Published in
Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155931
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yehuda Handelsman, John E Anderson, George L Bakris, Christie M Ballantyne, Deepak L Bhatt, Zachary T Bloomgarden, Biykem Bozkurt, Matthew J Budoff, Javed Butler, David Z I Cherney, Ralph A DeFronzo, Stefano Del Prato, Robert H Eckel, Gerasimos Filippatos, Gregg C Fonarow, Vivian A Fonseca, W Timothy Garvey, Francesco Giorgino, Peter J Grant, Jennifer B Green, Stephen J Greene, Per-Henrik Groop, George Grunberger, Ania M Jastreboff, Paul S Jellinger, Kamlesh Khunti, Samuel Klein, Mikhail N Kosiborod, Pamela Kushner, Lawrence A Leiter, Norman E Lepor, Christos S Mantzoros, Chantal Mathieu, Christian W Mende, Erin D Michos, Javier Morales, Jorge Plutzky, Richard E Pratley, Kausik K Ray, Peter Rossing, Naveed Sattar, Peter E H Schwarz, Eberhard Standl, P Gabriel Steg, Lale Tokgözoğlu, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Paul Valensi, Matthew R Weir, John Wilding, Eugene E Wright

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 282 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 33%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 12 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2024.
All research outputs
#258,469
of 26,797,106 outputs
Outputs from Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
#45
of 3,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,742
of 329,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,797,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.