The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: awareness, recognition, and risk mitigation in the emergency department
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.15441/ceem.24.231 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Shalaby, Raghav Sahni, Richard Hamilton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,142,325
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
#49
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,176
of 325,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them