The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A single fast Hebbian-like process enabling one-shot class addition in deep neural networks without backbone modification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1344114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kazufumi Hosoda, Keigo Nishida, Shigeto Seno, Tomohiro Mashita, Hideki Kashioka, Izumi Ohzawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 10 | 36% |
Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 79% |
Scientists | 5 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,470,431
of 26,626,138 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,445
of 11,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,591
of 321,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.