You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Principles for area‐based biodiversity conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.14459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Riva, Nick Haddad, Lenore Fahrig, Cristina Banks‐Leite |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Congo | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 114 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 60% |
| Scientists | 47 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#565,768
of 26,219,305 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#257
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,997
of 207,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,219,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.