The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Permanent makeup: A review of its technique, regulation, and complications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.098 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ghazal Ghafari, Jack Newcomer, Sarah Rigali, Walter Liszewski |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#151,275
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#90
of 11,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,587
of 276,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#1
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.