↓ Skip to main content

Association of circulating minerals and vitamins with pregnancy complications: a Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of circulating minerals and vitamins with pregnancy complications: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1334974
Authors

Yuan Xie, Jie Zhang, Shuang Ni, Ji Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,275,129
of 26,219,305 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,036
of 7,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,017
of 185,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#15
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,219,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.