The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An overview of prognostic markers in patients with CLL
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1371057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Braish, Claudio Cerchione, Alessandra Ferrajoli |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,037,184
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,785
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,303
of 272,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#8
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.