The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disrupted Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Effective Connectivity of the Nucleus Accumbens in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s455239 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bo Zhang, Minmin Guo, Ting Dong, Huajuan Yang, Qiujuan Zhang, Quanxin Yang, Xiaoqian Zhou, Cuiping Mao, Ming Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 80% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 80% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,026,495
of 26,176,298 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#687
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,310
of 223,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.