↓ Skip to main content

Dyadic body competence predicts movement synchrony during the mirror game

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dyadic body competence predicts movement synchrony during the mirror game
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1401494
Authors

Ryssa Moffat, Leonie Roos, Courtney Casale, Emily S. Cross

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,135,178
of 26,213,600 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,639
of 7,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,397
of 182,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.