The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hop, walk or bound? Limb proportions in kangaroos and the probable locomotion of the extinct genus Protemnodon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10914-024-09725-4 |
Authors |
Billie Jones, Christine M. Janis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Mexico | 2 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 86% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#383,658
of 26,812,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#5
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,446
of 321,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,812,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.