↓ Skip to main content

Trending ticks: using Google Trends data to understand tickborne disease prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trending ticks: using Google Trends data to understand tickborne disease prevention
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1410713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Xian Yang, Lauri M. Baker, Ashley McLeod-Morin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,561,241
of 26,231,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#10,435
of 14,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,489
of 217,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#143
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,231,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.