The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Revisiting the evolution of bow-tie architecture in signaling networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
npj Systems Biology and Applications, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41540-024-00396-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thoma Itoh, Yohei Kondo, Kazuhiro Aoki, Nen Saito |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 9 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,621,928
of 26,740,027 outputs
Outputs from npj Systems Biology and Applications
#68
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,281
of 316,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Systems Biology and Applications
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,740,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.