224 followers
The study suggests that research on retracted literature would require querying more than one source and that it should be advisable to accurately identify and label this literature in academic databases. https://t.co/QmmrBOva3P
1,436 followers
Of Possible Interest to Folks Here: The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science. (https://t.co/zi0uD3wNQC)
95,038 followers
“The study suggests that research on retracted literature would require querying more than one source…” (The study did not use the Retraction Watch Database for reasons they describe.) https://t.co/WCeTjGd0dR https://t.co/pozTqkirjX
264 followers
"Additionally, the high coverage of OpenAlex and Scilit could be explained by the inaccurate labeling of retracted documents in Scopus, Dimensions, and The Lens." https://t.co/WwesalL9m8 My take would be: just go to @OpenAlex_org for reliability.