The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comprehensive review of current knowledge on penile squamous cell carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1375882 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nishanth Thumma, Neharaj Pitla, Vasavi Gorantla, Maira du Plessis |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#425,673
of 26,637,793 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#67
of 23,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,548
of 332,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#1
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,637,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.