↓ Skip to main content

Tissue-based T cell activation and viral RNA persist for up to 2 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Overview of attention for article published in Science Translational Medicine, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 5,233)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
72 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
2891 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tissue-based T cell activation and viral RNA persist for up to 2 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection
Published in
Science Translational Medicine, July 2024
DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk3295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Peluso, Dylan Ryder, Robert R Flavell, Yingbing Wang, Jelena Levi, Brian H LaFranchi, Tyler-Marie Deveau, Amanda M Buck, Sadie E Munter, Kofi A Asare, Maya Aslam, Walter Koch, Gyula Szabo, Rebecca Hoh, Monika Deswal, Antonio E Rodriguez, Melissa Buitrago, Viva Tai, Uttam Shrestha, Scott Lu, Sarah A Goldberg, Thomas Dalhuisen, Joshua J Vasquez, Matthew S Durstenfeld, Priscilla Y Hsue, J Daniel Kelly, Nitasha Kumar, Jeffrey N Martin, Aruna Gambhir, Ma Somsouk, Youngho Seo, Steven G Deeks, Zoltan G Laszik, Henry F VanBrocklin, Timothy J Henrich

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,891 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 39%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1837. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,787
of 26,629,686 outputs
Outputs from Science Translational Medicine
#15
of 5,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104
of 306,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Translational Medicine
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,629,686 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.