↓ Skip to main content

Worry and ruminative brooding: associations with cognitive and physical health in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Worry and ruminative brooding: associations with cognitive and physical health in older adults
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M. Morse, Freya Koutsoubelis, Tim Whitfield, Harriet Demnitz-King, Valentin Ourry, Josh Stott, Anne Chocat, Eglantine Ferrand Devouge, Zuzana Walker, Olga Klimecki, Fabienne Collette, Gael Chetelat, Julie Gonneaud, Geraldine Poisnel, Natalie L. Marchant, for the Medit-Ageing Research Group, Florence Allais, Claire André, Eider Arenaza-Urquijo, Romain Bachelet, Sebastian Baez Lugo, Thorsten Barnhofer, Maelle Botton, Nina Coll-Padros, Robin De Flores, Vincent De La Sayette, Marion Delarue, Stéphanie Egret, Hélène Espérou, Eric Frison, Karine Goldet, Idir Hamdidouche, Marc Heidmann, Agathe Joret Philippe, Elizabeth Kuhn, Renaud La Joie, Brigitte Landeau, Gwendoline Le Du, Valérie Lefranc, Maria Leon, Dix Meiberth, Florence Mezenge, Inés Moulinet, Cassandre Palix, Léo Paly, Anne Quillard, Géraldine Rauchs, Stéphane Rehel, Florence Requier, Leslie Reyrolle, Laura Richert, Ana Salinero, Eric Salmon, Raquel Sanchez, Lena Sannemann, Ann-Katrin Schild, Marco Schlosser, Clémence Tomadesso, Edelweiss Touron, Denis Vivien, Patrik Vuilleumier, Cédrick Wallet

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,647,587
of 26,284,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,516
of 35,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,889
of 163,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#18
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,284,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.