The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nephrotoxicity of targeted therapy used to treat lung cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1369118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qiuling Li, Jieshan Lin, Guojun Hao, Aihua Xie, Shuangxin Liu, Bin Tang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 3 | 14% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,933,103
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,538
of 33,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,090
of 299,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#35
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.