The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Parental experience administering epinephrine for systemic reactions during infant and toddler oral food challenges
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.045 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Theodorakakis, Scott Machado, Mharlove Andre, Arielle Hazi, Zoe Ongaro, Lydia Pan, Samantha Yap, Wayne Shreffler, Michael Pistiner |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,872,218
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#470
of 4,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,837
of 313,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.