The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adherence to recommended clinical guidelines in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer across the US, Europe, and Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s183216 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco D DiBonaventura, Bijal Shah-Manek, Karen Higginbottom, John R Penrod, Yong Yuan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Librarian | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,902,959
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#472
of 1,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,768
of 452,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.