The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Sybr Green I, ELISA and conventional agarose gel-based PCR in the detection of infectious bursal disease virus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiological Research, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.micres.2006.08.003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
H. Hairul Aini, A.R. Omar, M. Hair-Bejo, I. Aini |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 28% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,757,784
of 26,467,269 outputs
Outputs from Microbiological Research
#170
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,235
of 89,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiological Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,467,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them