↓ Skip to main content

Macular Hole Surgery as a Historical Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macular Hole Surgery as a Historical Perspective
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2024
DOI 10.2147/opth.s466140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuyuki Kumagai, Eiji Horie, Marie Fukami, Mariko Furukawa

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,905,193
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,520
of 3,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,796
of 304,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.