↓ Skip to main content

Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Quality, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project
Published in
BMJ Open Quality, July 2024
DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002679
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tabitha Winnifrith, Catherine Millington-Sanders, Emma Husbands, Jane Haros, Helen Ballinger

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 16 70%
Other 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 16 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Linguistics 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,476,779
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#331
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,229
of 297,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#4
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.