The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eser Prisca, Calamai Pietro, Kalberer Anja, Stuetz Laura, Huber Sarina, Kaesermann Dominic, Guler Sabina, Wilhelm Matthias |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,799,029
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,417
of 15,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,700
of 136,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#12
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.