The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
When overextended surface allocation turns to groundwater: a Q methodology of well users in Oregon’s high desert
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1398439 |
Authors |
Melissa Haeffner, Janet Cowal, Brandy Walker, Clare McClellan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,649,287
of 26,323,740 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,230
of 4,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,499
of 144,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,323,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.