↓ Skip to main content

Allogeneic CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy in patients with severe myositis and systemic sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
242 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allogeneic CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy in patients with severe myositis and systemic sclerosis
Published in
Cell, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaobing Wang, Xin Wu, Binghe Tan, Liang Zhu, Yi Zhang, Li Lin, Yi Xiao, An Sun, Xinyi Wan, Shiyuan Liu, Yanfang Liu, Na Ta, Hang Zhang, Jialin Song, Ting Li, Ling Zhou, Jian Yin, Lingying Ye, Hongjuan Lu, Jinwei Hong, Hui Cheng, Ping Wang, Weiqing Li, Jianfeng Chen, Jin Zhang, Jing Luo, Miaozhen Huang, Lehang Guo, Xiaoming Pan, Yi Jin, Wenjing Ye, Lie Dai, Jian Zhu, Lingyun Sun, Biao Zheng, Dali Li, Yanran He, Mingyao Liu, Huaxiang Wu, Bing Du, Huji Xu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 242 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Other 10 22%
Unspecified 9 20%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Unspecified 11 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2024.
All research outputs
#228,474
of 26,627,710 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,258
of 17,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,806
of 296,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#23
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,627,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.