↓ Skip to main content

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Emergency Departments (endorsed by European Association of Hospital Pharmacists)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
180 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Emergency Departments (endorsed by European Association of Hospital Pharmacists)
Published in
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teske Schoffelen, Cihan Papan, Elena Carrara, Khalid Eljaaly, Mical Paul, Emma Keuleyan, Alejandro Martin Quirós, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, Carlos Palos, Larissa May, Michael Pulia, Bojana Beovic, Eric Batard, Fredrik Resman, Marlies Hulscher, Jeroen Schouten, the ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2024.
All research outputs
#404,482
of 26,622,753 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#121
of 4,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,043
of 284,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,622,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.