The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Infection–nutrition feedbacks: fat supports pathogen clearance but pathogens reduce fat in a wild mammal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2024.0636 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel A. Smiley, Brittany L. Wagler, William H. Edwards, Jessica Jennings-Gaines, Katie Luukkonen, Kara Robbins, Marguerite Johnson, Alyson B. Courtemanch, Tony W. Mong, Daryl Lutz, Doug McWhirter, Jennifer L. Malmberg, Blake Lowrey, Kevin L. Monteith |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,992,369
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5,954
of 11,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,031
of 257,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#59
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.