The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Hydroxyurea on follicle density in patients with sickle cell disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Blood Advances, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011536 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tamara Diesch-Furlanetto, Carlos Sanchez, Andrew Atkinson, Corinne Pondarre, Nathalie Dhedin, Bénédicte Neven, Cécile Arnaud, Annie Kamdem, France Pirenne, Gilles Lenaour, Isabelle Brocheriou, Benoit Terris, Françoise Bernaudin, Jean-Hugues Dalle, Catherine Poirot |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 67% |
Other | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#360,530
of 26,501,765 outputs
Outputs from Blood Advances
#50
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,612
of 239,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Advances
#2
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,501,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.