The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Junliang Zou, Weiwei Zhang, Yun Zhang, Juying Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 17% |
Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,088,799
of 26,350,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,967
of 30,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,909
of 422,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#83
of 1,063 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,350,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,063 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.