The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Five questions with Ryan Flynn
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41587-024-02311-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Francisco |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 26% |
Singapore | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
Scientists | 9 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,370,678
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#3,169
of 8,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,522
of 162,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#24
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.