↓ Skip to main content

Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir or Daily F/TAF for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Women

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
330 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
988 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir or Daily F/TAF for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Women
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2024
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2407001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda-Gail Bekker, Moupali Das, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Khatija Ahmed, Joanne Batting, William Brumskine, Katherine Gill, Ishana Harkoo, Manjeetha Jaggernath, Godfrey Kigozi, Noah Kiwanuka, Philip Kotze, Limakatso Lebina, Cheryl E. Louw, Moelo Malahleha, Mmatsie Manentsa, Leila E. Mansoor, Dhayendre Moodley, Vimla Naicker, Logashvari Naidoo, Megeshinee Naidoo, Gonasagrie Nair, Nkosiphile Ndlovu, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Ravindre Panchia, Saresha Pillay, Disebo Potloane, Pearl Selepe, Nishanta Singh, Yashna Singh, Elizabeth Spooner, Amy M. Ward, Zwelethu Zwane, Ramin Ebrahimi, Yang Zhao, Alexander Kintu, Chris Deaton, Christoph C. Carter, Jared M. Baeten, Flavia Matovu Kiweewa

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 988 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Unspecified 9 15%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Unspecified 11 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2996. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2024.
All research outputs
#2,310
of 26,793,597 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#156
of 33,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18
of 300,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,793,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.