The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discordance between taxonomy and population genomic data: An avian example relevant to the United States Endangered Species Act
|
---|---|
Published in |
PNAS Nexus, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae298 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew N Black, Andrew J Mularo, Jong Yoon Jeon, David Haukos, Kristin J Bondo, Kent A Fricke, Andy Gregory, Blake Grisham, Zachary E Lowe, J Andrew DeWoody |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 69% |
Members of the public | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,590,015
of 26,617,554 outputs
Outputs from PNAS Nexus
#305
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,524
of 281,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PNAS Nexus
#32
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.