The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A diet-wide Mendelian randomization analysis: causal effects of dietary habits on type 2 diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1414678 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rui Xiao, Li Dong, Bo Xie, Beizhong Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,135,096
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,953
of 7,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,355
of 230,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#120
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.