The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A review on plasma-based CO2 utilization: process considerations in the development of sustainable chemical production
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plasma Science and Technology, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.1088/2058-6272/ad52c4 |
Authors |
LI Sirui, Giulia De FELICE, Simona EICHKORN, SHAO Tao, Fausto GALLUCCI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 5 | 42% |
Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,923,003
of 26,370,058 outputs
Outputs from Plasma Science and Technology
#17
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,164
of 24,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plasma Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them