The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The negative association between the docosapentaenoic acid intake and the incidence of AMD based on NHANES 2005–2008
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1435775 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baiwei Xu, Yi Hu, Jie Di, Zhongwei Liu, Ziyan Yu, Lin Han, Yuan Ning |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,106,859
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,605
of 7,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,800
of 203,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#68
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.