The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Unraveling persistent dyspnea after mild COVID: insights from a case series on hyperventilation provocation tests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394642 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ophélie Ritter, Sofia Noureddine, Lucie Laurent, Pauline Roux, Virginie Westeel, Cindy Barnig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 90% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,967,422
of 26,622,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,614
of 15,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,660
of 282,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#10
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,622,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.