The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cervical screening participation and access facilitators and barriers for people with intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1379497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosalie Power, Michael David, Iva Strnadová, Lauren Touyz, Caroline Basckin, Julie Loblinzk, Heather Jolly, Elizabeth Kennedy, Jane Ussher, Sally Sweeney, Ee-Lin Chang, Allison Carter, Deborah Bateson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2024.
All research outputs
#16,760,317
of 26,493,631 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,983
of 13,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,629
of 205,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#51
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,631 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.