The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Key quality parameter comparison of mesenchymal stem cell product cryopreserved in different cryopreservation solutions for clinical applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1412811 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuan Tan, Mahmoud Salkhordeh, Aidan B. P. Murray, Luciana Souza-Moreira, Duncan J. Stewart, Shirley H. J. Mei |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,509,344
of 26,402,896 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,291
of 8,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,698
of 137,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#22
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.