The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optical genome mapping identifies a homozygous deletion in the non-coding region of the SCN9A gene in individuals from the same family with congenital insensitivity to pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2024.1375770 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aïcha Boughalem, Viorica Ciorna-Monferrato, Natacha Sloboda, Amélie Guegan, François Page, Sophie Zimmer, Marion Benazra, Pascale Kleinfinger, Laurence Lohmann, Mylène Valduga, Aline Receveur, Fernando Martin, Detlef Trost |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,877,673
of 26,455,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,967
of 13,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,903
of 165,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#5
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,455,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,992 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.