The issue with the paper the below Commentary 👇🏼relates to, is that it doesn't just illustrate how shoddy, motivated, work can still be published as science, but how this is made possible if it slips past an editor and,more importantly, the right peer revi
RT @FrontPubHealth: New Research: Commentary: Understanding the public voices and researchers speaking into the 5G narrative https://t.co/E…
New Research: Commentary: Understanding the public voices and researchers speaking into the 5G narrative https://t.co/E4JABn2Sem #FrontiersIn #PublicHealth
RT @dave_ehs: Open access. #5G #Radiation #EMFs https://t.co/jYI9MpLmCh https://t.co/PZXuizplB4