The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of circadian clock disruption on type 2 diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1435848 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hong Thuan Tran, Takeru Kondo, Amal Ashry, Yunyu Fu, Hiroko Okawa, Chenphop Sawangmake, Hiroshi Egusa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,450,478
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,529
of 15,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,923
of 255,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#20
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.