The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interactions between pool geometry and hydraulics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Water Resources Research, December 1998
|
DOI | 10.1029/1998wr900004 |
Authors |
Douglas M. Thompson, Jonathan M. Nelson, Ellen E. Wohl |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 37% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 31% |
Engineering | 15 | 25% |
Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,158,306
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#1,954
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,968
of 103,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.