The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wideband radiofrequency pulse sequence for evaluation of myocardial scar in patients with cardiac implantable devices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Radiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fradi.2024.1327406 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Neil D. Shah, Mayil Krishnam, Bharat Ambale Venkatesh, Fouzia Khan, Michele Smith, Darwin R. Jones, Patrick Koon, Xianglun Mao, Martin A. Janich, Anja C. S. Brau, Michael Salerno, Rajesh Dash, Frandics Chan, Phillip C. Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,536,696
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Radiology
#67
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,703
of 135,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Radiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.