The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of inflammation on the expression of microRNA-140 in extracellular vesicles from 2D and 3D culture models of synovial-membrane-derived stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1416694 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
João Pedro Hübbe Pfeifer, Fernanda de Castro Stievani, Célio J. da Costa Fernandes, Gustavo dos Santos Rosa, Emanuel Vitor Pereira Apolonio, Mariana Correa Rossi, Willian Fernando Zambuzzi, Ana Liz Garcia Alves |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,078,961
of 26,454,856 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,273
of 8,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,565
of 148,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#17
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,454,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.