The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Unsupervised identification of Greater Caribbean manatees using Scattering Wavelet Transform and Hierarchical Density Clustering from underwater bioacoustics recordings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1416247 |
Authors |
Fernando Merchan, Kenji Contreras, Héctor Poveda, Hector M. Guzman, Javier E. Sanchez-Galan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Panama | 4 | 31% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,752,944
of 26,593,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,410
of 11,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,584
of 227,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#19
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,593,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.