The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sustainability initiatives in inpatient psychiatry: tackling food waste
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1374788 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timur Liwinski, Iona Bocek, Andreas Schmidt, Eva Kowalinski, Frieder Dechent, Franziska Rabenschlag, Julian Moeller, Jan Sarlon, Annette B. Brühl, André Nienaber, Undine E. Lang, Christian G. Huber |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,768,445
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,693
of 13,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,107
of 262,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#26
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.