The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. flavonoids improve cyclophosphamide-induced reproductive function damage by regulating the testosterone synthesis pathway
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1457780 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiarong Chen, Xiaoyue Yang, Zhongmei He, Weijia Chen, Yan Zhao, Jianming Li, Ying Zong, Rui Du |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,603,629
of 26,518,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,461
of 20,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,936
of 134,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#62
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,518,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.