The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of autologous micrografts technology: a promising approach for chronic wound healing and tissue regeneration—a pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1417920 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisabetta Adelaide Baglioni, Franco Perego, Elisa Paolin, Alberto Abate, Tommaso Pusceddu, Barbara Zavan, Maria Alessandra Bocchiotti |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,523,061
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,742
of 7,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,677
of 199,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#46
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.